Trump and the non-existent wiretaps: Much ado about nothing

-


Well, folks, the train wreck that is the Trump presidency keeps getting loopier with each passing day. 

By now you've probably gotten word that the 45th President of the U.S. is now claiming that former President Barack Obama had his office wiretapped during the 2016 election. Yep, that's right. Mr. "Most Unpopular President" says that his predecessor took his cues from disgraced ex-President Richard Nixon and bugged the phones in Mr. Trump's suite at the Trump Tower in Manhattan to, as conservative radio host Mark Levin claims, "surveille members of his campaign." 

In a Twitter tweet posted on Saturday, the President said, "How low has President Obama gone to tapp (sic) my phones during the very sacred election process. This is Nixon/Watergate. Bad (or sick) guy!"

These are serious allegations, especially since (a) the FBI, CIA, NSA, or any of the federal intelligence agencies can't wiretap anyone without a court order and (b) President Trump isn't accusing Obama loyalists of such perfidy. He's accusing the former President. By name, at that.

Apparently, Mr. Trump seems to have gotten this strange (and toxic) notion from reading stuff on Breitbart, the far right "news" website which Stephen K. Bannon oversaw until he was named the White House's chief strategist last year. 

According to Politifact, the alt-right's favorite media outlet published an article last Friday that asked the Republican-controlled Congress to investigate radio commentator Mark Levin's claims that minions of then-President Obama bugged Mr. Trump's phones to dig up dirt so they could discredit him either before or after the election.

In the article, Levin claims that the investigations of connections between Mr. Trump's associates (including former National Security Adviser Mike Flynn and current Attorney General Jeff Sessions) amount to a virtual coup d'etat by the previous administration.

In its typical "attack mode" tone, Breitbart stated:

In summary: the Obama administration sought, and eventually obtained, authorization to eavesdrop on the Trump campaign; continued monitoring the Trump team even when no evidence of wrongdoing was found; then relaxed the NSA rules to allow evidence to be shared widely within the government, virtually ensuring that the information, including the conversations of private citizens, would be leaked to the media.
Levin called the effort a “silent coup” by the Obama administration and demanded that it be investigated.
But, as Politifact's Lauren Carroll writes:

 (N)o source alleges Obama personally ordered phone wiretaps or any other form of surveillance. The closest some get is alluding to possible FBI requests for a warrant to monitor Trump associates amid their investigation into improper Russia-related activity.

Carroll explains that while it is a well-known fact that U.S. intelligence agencies have been looking into the connections between Russia's government and members of Mr. Trump's campaign during (and after) the 2016 election, there is no evidence that President Obama or his administration bugged Mr. Trump's phones. 

The New York Times and Washington Post are reporting — based on anonymous sources — that FBI Director James Comey asked the Justice Department to publicly refute Trump’s tweets because they wrongly imply the FBI broke the law.
Additionally, an Obama spokesman has categorically denied that the Obama White House ordered any wiretapping.
"Neither President Obama nor any White House official ever ordered surveillance on any U.S. citizen. Any suggestion otherwise is simply false," spokesman Kevin Lewis said.
James Clapper, director of national intelligence under Obama, also denied that there was any FISA court-authorized national security wiretap of Trump or his campaign during the election, in a March 5 Meet the Press interview on NBC.
"I will say that for the part of the national security apparatus that I oversaw as DNI, was there no such wiretap activity mounted against the president-elect at the time or as a candidate or against his campaign," Clapper said. "I can't speak for other title 3-authorized entities in the government or a state or local entity."
Our take at A Certain Point of View is that Mr. Trump is either grasping at straws or he is muddying the waters in an effort to deflect attention from the Republicans' assault on the Affordable Care Act (ACA), the environment, the Department of Education, and the funding of Historically Black Colleges and Universities. 
As long as his right-wing base is enraged about allegations of nefarious doings by President Obama and the "mainstream media," the alt-right and the Republicans in Congress can push their pet projects of ending regulations that protect the environment, repealing the ACA and replacing it with a new healthcare plan that favors the wealthy, and dismantling the Department of Education. 
Sources: 

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/837996746236182529?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2017/mar/06/did-donald-trump-invent-claim-barack-obama-tapped-/

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/03/03/mark-levin-obama-used-police-state-tactics-undermine-trump/


  


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How many movies have been made based on Stephen King's 'It'?

-
Image
How many movies have been made based on Stephen King's It ? It  has been adapted twice for filmed audio-visual media. The first filmed version of  It was a TV limited series; the second was a duology of theatrically-released movies.  The first adaptation of Stephen King’s 1986 doorstop of a novel was a 1990 adaptation made as a two-part ABC miniseries for television. Among the cast members: Tim Reid, Harry Anderson, Annette O’Toole, John Ritter, and Richard Thomas. The miniseries also featured Tim Curry as the evil Pennywise the Clown. Adapted for television by director Tommy Lee Wallace and Lawrence D. Cohen (who also adapted King’s  Carrie  for director Brian De Palma in 1976),  It  was okay but a watered-down take on the scary novel about a group of friends who must face off against a monstrous entity known as “It” twice. Once as kids in 1960, then again as adults in 1990. (Like  11,22.63,  the TV version of It avoids the year 1958, which is where parts of  11/22/63 
Read more

Talking About 'Band of Brothers' (HBO Miniseries): Why were there no black soldiers in the Band of Brothers TV miniseries?

-
Image
Band of Brothers,  sadly, reflects one of the sad realities of American society in the 1940s - racial segregation in the armed forces. Although there  were  a few all-Negro (as blacks were referred to in those days) units in the U.S. Army and the Army Air Forces that served with distinction in the European Theater of Operations, most black servicemen were assigned to non-combat units in Supply of Services and other support forces. Most of these soldiers were truck drivers, anti-aircraft gunners, barrage balloon handlers, engineers, stevedores, clerks, cooks, corpsmen, and so on. Only late in the war (fall of 1944 and winter/spring 1945) did large numbers of black infantrymen see combat against German forces, and even then they served in all-black units commanded by white officers. © 2001 Home Box Office, Dreamworks SKG, and Play-Tone Pictures The 101st Airborne Division was an all-American unit made up of individuals from many different groups - Easy Company’s first C.O.,
Read more

Bolero: The One Movie I Have Seen That I Wish Could Be Erased From My Memory

-
Image
If you could have 1 movie that you’ve seen in the past erased from your memory, what movie would that be and why? That’s easy.  Bolero. © 1984 Cannon Film Group Now, I have seen more than my fair share of movies that, for one reason or another, I don’t enjoy at all or once liked but have changed my mind about as I have grown older.  Me Before You  is an example of the former;  Avatar  and  Midway  are exemplars of the latter. But writer-director John Derek’s softcore porn movie disguised as an “adventure in ecstasy” is still the dumbest, most boring film I ever paid a movie ticket to go see in an actual multiplex. It’s so bad, in fact, that my friends (yes, I went with a coed group of buds from college) and I decided, collectively, that as spectacular as Bo Derek looks naked, she was way too old to play a nubile if naive girl in her 20s. The story was just a barely-there plot woven together around a series of nude scenes (including the obligatory girl-girl scene) that
Read more