Dispatches from Trump's America: Those pesky Russia connections simply won't go away

-


During the past two months, Donald J. Trump and his various spokespeople (Sean Spicer and Kellyanne Conway being the chief mouthpieces of the Administration) have stated that no one in the Administration has any links to Russia or its kleptocratic leader, Vladimir Putin. And, despite evidence to the contrary, they insist that there is no hint that Russian hackers with connections to Russia's military intelligence agencies planted "fake news" in U.S. social media sites and tried to sway the election in Mr. Trump's favor. 

In one of Mr. Trump's rare Presidential press conferences back in February, he repeated this claim even after he had to accept then-National Security Adviser Michael Flynn for allegedly misleading Vice President Mike Pence about his pre-election contacts with Russia's ambassador to the U.S. 

According to a February 16 report on NPR.org (National Public Radio's website), Mr. Trump vehemently denied any link between his campaign and members of Putin's government:

Asked at the news conference about reports that members of the Trump staff were in contact with Russia during the campaign, Trump said, "Nobody that I know of."

Well, Mr. Trump is - as he is wont to do - constantly denying that he or any of his advisers have had any relationship with Moscow since his campaign started in 2015.  He also swears that any suggestions to the contrary are clever exercises in political misdirection by his adversaries.  

Again, per NPR:

"Russia is a ruse," Trump said. "I know you have to get up and ask a question. It's so important." He reiterated, "Russia is a ruse. I have nothing to do with Russia. Haven't made a phone call to Russia in years. Don't speak to people from Russia. Not that I wouldn't. I just have nobody to speak to. I spoke to Putin twice. He called me on the election. I told you this. And he called me on the inauguration, a few days ago."

Unfortunately, we think Mr. Trump doth protest too much. 

Not only do Mr. Trump's statements in support of Brexit (Great Britain's departure from the European Union) and his belief that the NATO alliance is obsolete play into the hands of Putin and his oligarch friends in the Kremlin, but at least five highly-placed individuals in Trump's campaign and present Administration have connections with Moscow. 

Inside this week's Time cover story, "Is Truth Dead?" (page 36, April 3, 2017 issue) there is a graphic titled Russia and the Trump Campaign. 

Under the banner "Trump's People," the following men are listed as having had business ties with or accepted money from individuals and agencies within the Russian government:

  • Mike Flynn, former National Security Adviser. According to the print version of the article, "routine intercepts of (Russian ambassador) Kislyak's calls overheard Flynn discussing U.S. sanctions on Russia while President Obama was still in office. Flynn was also paid over $33,000 to speak at a gala for Russia's state-run broadcaster RT." 
  • Paul Manafort, Trump's former campaign manager.  Time writes: "Manafort was Trump's campaign manager during the pivotal conclusion of the Republican primaries and the start of the general election. He was pushed out of the campaign over concerns about his consultancy work on behalf of Ukrainian strongman Viktor Yanukovich - who was backed by the Kremlin. 
  • Jeff Sessions, Attorney General. At his confirmation hearing, Sessions denied having communications with Russian representatives. However, "on March 1, the Washington Post revealed that Sessions had met twice with Moscow's envoy Kislyak while serving as one of Trump's top 2016 advisors."
  • Roger Stone, Adviser. Per Time: "The veteran GOP adviser and longtime Trump confidant admitted to communicating with Guccifer 2.0, a hacking group that claimed responsibility for leaking a stolen trove of Democratic National Committee documents in the 2016 campaign. Stone claims that the contacts were "completely innocuous and denies any connections to Russia." Oh, did we mention that it was Stone who recommended that Trump hire Manafort to run his campaign?
  • Carter Page, Campaign Adviser. Last year, Mr. Trump "identified Page, a former investment banker who has done business in Russia, as an adviser." Four months later, he "gave a speech in Moscow in which he criticized U.S. foreign policy to Russia."
I think this quintet doth protest too much. I also believe that no on in the White House, from Mr. Trump, can tell the truth to the American people.

As the online edition of Time's article "Can Trump Handle the Truth?" laments:


And what reality is Trump creating? He entered national politics in 2011 peddling the incredible theory that Obama might have been born in Africa–and therefore constitutionally barred from the presidency. In those days Trump was widely dismissed as a reckless self-promoter, though he clung to his story for five years, using it to get television bookings and newspaper coverage, before surrendering it with a shrug. Looking back, it’s striking to see a future President testing the waters by charging the elected incumbent with fraud and illegitimacy without introducing a shred of evidence.

That was a fitting warm-up for Trump’s official entry into the 2016 campaign. The Mexican government, he alleged, is deliberately dumping its hoodlums in the U.S. Later that year, he answered the Paris terrorist attacks by claiming, without substantiation, that he had seen “thousands and thousands of people” celebrating in New Jersey as the Twin Towers smoldered on 9/11 on television. (No footage is known to exist.)....

Trump has discovered something about epistemology in the 21st century. The truth may be real, but falsehood often works better. It is for this same reason that Russia deployed paid Internet trolls in the 2016 campaign, according to U.S. investigators, repeatedly promoting lies on U.S. social networks to muddy the debate. In the radical democracy of social media, even the retweets of outraged truth squadders has the effect of rebroadcasting false messages. Controversy elevates message. And it keeps the President on offense.

In other words, Mr. Trump has proven that George Orwell right all along. Black is white, and lies are the new truth. 

Sad. 


Sources:

http://www.npr.org/2017/02/16/515624391/nobody-that-i-know-of-trump-denies-campaign-contacts-with-russia

http://time.com/magazine/

Time magazine (print edition, April 3, 2017 issue, "Can Trump Handle the Truth?" (page 36 graphic) 







Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How many movies have been made based on Stephen King's 'It'?

-
Image
How many movies have been made based on Stephen King's It ? It  has been adapted twice for filmed audio-visual media. The first filmed version of  It was a TV limited series; the second was a duology of theatrically-released movies.  The first adaptation of Stephen King’s 1986 doorstop of a novel was a 1990 adaptation made as a two-part ABC miniseries for television. Among the cast members: Tim Reid, Harry Anderson, Annette O’Toole, John Ritter, and Richard Thomas. The miniseries also featured Tim Curry as the evil Pennywise the Clown. Adapted for television by director Tommy Lee Wallace and Lawrence D. Cohen (who also adapted King’s  Carrie  for director Brian De Palma in 1976),  It  was okay but a watered-down take on the scary novel about a group of friends who must face off against a monstrous entity known as “It” twice. Once as kids in 1960, then again as adults in 1990. (Like  11,22.63,  the TV version of It avoids the year ...
Read more

Talking About 'Band of Brothers' (HBO Miniseries): Why were there no black soldiers in the Band of Brothers TV miniseries?

-
Image
Band of Brothers,  sadly, reflects one of the sad realities of American society in the 1940s - racial segregation in the armed forces. Although there  were  a few all-Negro (as blacks were referred to in those days) units in the U.S. Army and the Army Air Forces that served with distinction in the European Theater of Operations, most black servicemen were assigned to non-combat units in Supply of Services and other support forces. Most of these soldiers were truck drivers, anti-aircraft gunners, barrage balloon handlers, engineers, stevedores, clerks, cooks, corpsmen, and so on. Only late in the war (fall of 1944 and winter/spring 1945) did large numbers of black infantrymen see combat against German forces, and even then they served in all-black units commanded by white officers. © 2001 Home Box Office, Dreamworks SKG, and Play-Tone Pictures The 101st Airborne Division was an all-American unit made up of individuals from many different groups - Easy Company’...
Read more

'The Boy in Striped Pajamas' movie review

-
Image
(C) 2008 Miramax, Heyday Films, BBC Films Writer-director Mark Herman’s 2008 film “The Boy in the Striped Pajamas” is a faithful but (necessarily) condensed adaptation of John Boyne’s 2007 novel about a German boy, Bruno (Asa Butterfield), who befriends Shmuel (Jack Scanlon), an eight-year-old inmate in a Nazi concentration camp during World War II.  Like Boyne’s novel, the film is not a definitive history of the Holocaust. It’s not as graphic or historically accurate as Steven Spielberg’s 1993 classic “Schindler’s List,” nor was it intended to be. (Indeed, Herman says in the behind-the-scenes featurette “Friendship Beyond the Fence” that he doesn’t consider “The Boy in the Striped Pajamas” to be a “Holocaust film.”) Set in the early 1940s at the height of Nazi Germany’s power, the film follows Bruno on a journey that takes him and his family from Berlin to German-occupied Poland. His father Ralf (David Thewlis) is a newly-promoted SS officer with a new posting: commandant...
Read more