How does President Trump's budget 'make America great again'? By cutting funding for Meals on Wheels to pay for his precious Mexican wall

-
Back in the seemingly long-ago days of the 2016 Presidential election, then-candidate Donald J. Trump declared that if elected, he would order the construction of a wall along the nearly 1,900 mile-long border with Mexico.

 In fact, this was one of the first major campaign promises he made on the day that he announced his candidacy...on June 16, 2015.

 On that now fateful date, Mr. Trump said, "I will build a great wall - and nobody builds better walls than me, believe me - and I'll build them very inexpensively. I will build a great, great wall on our southern border, and I will make Mexico pay for that wall. Mark my words."

 Fast forward to March 2017, and we see that Mr. Trump ordered that great wall to be built, but couldn't make Mexico pay for it after all.

 The 1,900-mile-long Trump Wall is hardly inexpensive. According to a report by Reuters, the wall is estimated to cost up to $21.6 billion, and will take at least three years to build.

 Those $21.6 billion won't be coming out of Mexico's central bank. Nor will they be coming from Mr. Trump's fortune.

 Nope, those billions will be paid by Mr. and Mrs. American taxpayer.

 Of course, Congress can't magically make those billions of dollars appear from nowhere. And the budget can't simply be adjusted by adding a "Mexican wall" item on the list of federal programs that require funding without making cuts somewhere.

 Logic suggests that if any cuts are to be made, they could come from the defense budget.

 Per the U.S. Defense Department, the current fiscal year's budget (authorized by President Obama) is a whopping $582.7 billion. This makes the U.S. the number one spender on defense in the globe. Currently, defense spending makes up 3.3% of our Gross Domestic Product (GDP), according to data from the World Bank.

 Clearly, cutting $21.6 billion from the Pentagon would be significant but hardly detrimental to our overall defense. We could buy a smaller number of Virginia-class nuclear submarines, which have a per-unit cost of $2.688 billion for some of the savings. Or maybe we can get rid of some our old nuclear weapons and not build any new ones; we have enough nukes to destroy any potential adversary as it is.

 But, no. Mr. Trump wants to cut social programs that his budget guy, Mick Mulvaney, says "don't work."

 “We can’t spend money on programs just because they sound good. And great, Meals on Wheels sounds great. Again, that’s a state decision to fund that particular portion, to take the federal money and give it to the states, and say look, we want to give you money for programs that don’t work. I can’t defend that anymore. We cannot defend that anymore.”

 According to the New York Times, this is an inaccurate statement. 

 False. Meals on Wheels helps 2.4 million people each year, including 500,000 veterans and 226,000 older citizens in the three states Mr. Mulvaney specified. And a body of research shows that it does work.

 Evaluation of the home-meal delivery program found that participating helped reduce feelings of loneliness and the risk of falls while improving nutrition and food security, and even decreasing government spending.

 The New York Times explains that some of this program's federal funding is mandated by the Older Americans Act, and that it is not clear whether those funds are covered in the cuts. (Trump's budget is not clear on specifics. One wonders why.) However, other sources of funding for Meals on Wheels do come from block grants which are on the Administration's chopping block.

 Again, per the Times:

 The White House does propose to eliminate the Community Service and Community Development Block Grants, two programs that provide assistance to antipoverty efforts. These are characterized by the budget as having little effect, but are used by many state and local Meals on Wheels programs to cover gaps in funding, said Jenny Bertolette, the vice president of communications at Meals on Wheels.

At the same time that President Trump is asking his minions to cut spending to help the poor in the U.S., he wants to add $54 billion to an already bloated Pentagon budget. 

 If this is what Mr. Trump means by making America great again, he is doing so at the expense of our most vulnerable citizens.

Sources:

 http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-immigration-wall-exclusive-idUSKBN15O2ZN

 http://www.cbsnews.com/pictures/wild-donald-trump-quotes/14/

 https://www.defense.gov/News/News-Releases/News-Release-View/Article/652687/department-of-defense-dod-releases-fiscal-year-2017-presidents-budget-proposal

 https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/17/us/politics/fact-check-mick-mulvaney-trump-budget-director.html?_r=0

 http://www.cnn.com/2017/03/16/politics/donald-trump-defense-budget-blueprint/

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How many movies have been made based on Stephen King's 'It'?

-
Image
How many movies have been made based on Stephen King's It ? It  has been adapted twice for filmed audio-visual media. The first filmed version of  It was a TV limited series; the second was a duology of theatrically-released movies.  The first adaptation of Stephen King’s 1986 doorstop of a novel was a 1990 adaptation made as a two-part ABC miniseries for television. Among the cast members: Tim Reid, Harry Anderson, Annette O’Toole, John Ritter, and Richard Thomas. The miniseries also featured Tim Curry as the evil Pennywise the Clown. Adapted for television by director Tommy Lee Wallace and Lawrence D. Cohen (who also adapted King’s  Carrie  for director Brian De Palma in 1976),  It  was okay but a watered-down take on the scary novel about a group of friends who must face off against a monstrous entity known as “It” twice. Once as kids in 1960, then again as adults in 1990. (Like  11,22.63,  the TV version of It avoids the year ...
Read more

Talking About 'Band of Brothers' (HBO Miniseries): Why were there no black soldiers in the Band of Brothers TV miniseries?

-
Image
Band of Brothers,  sadly, reflects one of the sad realities of American society in the 1940s - racial segregation in the armed forces. Although there  were  a few all-Negro (as blacks were referred to in those days) units in the U.S. Army and the Army Air Forces that served with distinction in the European Theater of Operations, most black servicemen were assigned to non-combat units in Supply of Services and other support forces. Most of these soldiers were truck drivers, anti-aircraft gunners, barrage balloon handlers, engineers, stevedores, clerks, cooks, corpsmen, and so on. Only late in the war (fall of 1944 and winter/spring 1945) did large numbers of black infantrymen see combat against German forces, and even then they served in all-black units commanded by white officers. © 2001 Home Box Office, Dreamworks SKG, and Play-Tone Pictures The 101st Airborne Division was an all-American unit made up of individuals from many different groups - Easy Company’...
Read more

'The Boy in Striped Pajamas' movie review

-
Image
(C) 2008 Miramax, Heyday Films, BBC Films Writer-director Mark Herman’s 2008 film “The Boy in the Striped Pajamas” is a faithful but (necessarily) condensed adaptation of John Boyne’s 2007 novel about a German boy, Bruno (Asa Butterfield), who befriends Shmuel (Jack Scanlon), an eight-year-old inmate in a Nazi concentration camp during World War II.  Like Boyne’s novel, the film is not a definitive history of the Holocaust. It’s not as graphic or historically accurate as Steven Spielberg’s 1993 classic “Schindler’s List,” nor was it intended to be. (Indeed, Herman says in the behind-the-scenes featurette “Friendship Beyond the Fence” that he doesn’t consider “The Boy in the Striped Pajamas” to be a “Holocaust film.”) Set in the early 1940s at the height of Nazi Germany’s power, the film follows Bruno on a journey that takes him and his family from Berlin to German-occupied Poland. His father Ralf (David Thewlis) is a newly-promoted SS officer with a new posting: commandant...
Read more