Q&As About Star Wars: Does the New Star Wars Trilogy Diminish the Events of the Original Trilogy?

-


On Quora, member Al Hartley asks:
Does the fact that the Empire is still basically around in the new Star Wars trilogy diminish the events of the original trilogy?
As Luke Skywalker says in Star Wars - Episode VIII: The Last Jedi, “Every single word you just said is wrong.”
First off, the Galactic Empire is not “basically around” 30-some odd years after the destruction of the Death Star II and the downfall of Emperor Palpatine and his evil regime.
The main antagonist of the heroes in the Sequel Trilogy is not the old Empire. As the title crawl of Star Wars - Episode VIII: The Force Awakens states:
Luke Skywalker has vanished. In his absence,
the sinister FIRST ORDER has risen from the
ashes of the Empire and will not rest until
Skywalker, the last Jedi, has been destroyed.
The villains - Kylo Ren, Supreme Leader Snoke, Armitage Hux, Captain Phasma, et. al. are not Imperials. They are, in essence, neo-Imperials, fanatical adherents of Palpatine’s New Order who fled to the Unknown Regions after the Battle of Jakku ended in the defeat of the old Imperial military and Mas Amedda, the Emperor’s Vizier, signed the Galactic Concordance, thus ending the Galactic Civil War.
In real-life terms, it’s as if Hermann Goering, Heinrich Himmler, Martin Bormann and a cadre of fanatical Nazis had eluded Allied forces in 1945 Europe and fled to Argentina or Brazil; 30 years later, their children and maybe a few now-old former Nazi officers have raised an army of devotees to Nazi ideals, built their own Hitlerian utopia in the jungles of South America, complete with factories and a military-industrial complex that rivals the U.S. and Russia, and now wants to avenge Germany’s defeat in World War II.
That’s what the First Order is; it’s a group of bitter revanchists who glorify the old Empire and mimic its ethos, its technological design philosophies, and its military structure, but it’s not the Empire.
As to the “does it diminish the events of the Original Trilogy” part of the question:
No, the Sequel Trilogy does not do that.
Seriously, think about the logic behind that question.
History tells us that wars never have tidy and “they-all-lived-happily-ever-after” resolutions. The Civil War of 1861–65 left scars on our nation that have yet to heal. The definitely messy ending to the First World War led to the beginning of the Second World War 20 years after the Treaty of Versailles was signed in 1919. Likewise, the people of Earth did not simply hold hands and sing Kumbaya when World War II ended on September 2, 1945; the Cold War between the U.S.-led Free World and the Soviet-led Communist bloc began shortly after the surrenders of Germany and Japan, and we’re still seeing the side effects of all those conflicts in 2019.
If Star Wars was going to continue in any fashion in a universe set 30 years after the fall of the old Empire, it had to show a galaxy that did not, in effect, have the expected “happily-ever-after” ending that was implied when the credits rolled at the end of Return of the Jedi. Otherwise, what’s the point in making a Sequel Trilogy at all?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How many movies have been made based on Stephen King's 'It'?

-
Image
How many movies have been made based on Stephen King's It ? It  has been adapted twice for filmed audio-visual media. The first filmed version of  It was a TV limited series; the second was a duology of theatrically-released movies.  The first adaptation of Stephen King’s 1986 doorstop of a novel was a 1990 adaptation made as a two-part ABC miniseries for television. Among the cast members: Tim Reid, Harry Anderson, Annette O’Toole, John Ritter, and Richard Thomas. The miniseries also featured Tim Curry as the evil Pennywise the Clown. Adapted for television by director Tommy Lee Wallace and Lawrence D. Cohen (who also adapted King’s  Carrie  for director Brian De Palma in 1976),  It  was okay but a watered-down take on the scary novel about a group of friends who must face off against a monstrous entity known as “It” twice. Once as kids in 1960, then again as adults in 1990. (Like  11,22.63,  the TV version of It avoids the year ...
Read more

Talking About 'Band of Brothers' (HBO Miniseries): Why were there no black soldiers in the Band of Brothers TV miniseries?

-
Image
Band of Brothers,  sadly, reflects one of the sad realities of American society in the 1940s - racial segregation in the armed forces. Although there  were  a few all-Negro (as blacks were referred to in those days) units in the U.S. Army and the Army Air Forces that served with distinction in the European Theater of Operations, most black servicemen were assigned to non-combat units in Supply of Services and other support forces. Most of these soldiers were truck drivers, anti-aircraft gunners, barrage balloon handlers, engineers, stevedores, clerks, cooks, corpsmen, and so on. Only late in the war (fall of 1944 and winter/spring 1945) did large numbers of black infantrymen see combat against German forces, and even then they served in all-black units commanded by white officers. © 2001 Home Box Office, Dreamworks SKG, and Play-Tone Pictures The 101st Airborne Division was an all-American unit made up of individuals from many different groups - Easy Company’...
Read more

'The Boy in Striped Pajamas' movie review

-
Image
(C) 2008 Miramax, Heyday Films, BBC Films Writer-director Mark Herman’s 2008 film “The Boy in the Striped Pajamas” is a faithful but (necessarily) condensed adaptation of John Boyne’s 2007 novel about a German boy, Bruno (Asa Butterfield), who befriends Shmuel (Jack Scanlon), an eight-year-old inmate in a Nazi concentration camp during World War II.  Like Boyne’s novel, the film is not a definitive history of the Holocaust. It’s not as graphic or historically accurate as Steven Spielberg’s 1993 classic “Schindler’s List,” nor was it intended to be. (Indeed, Herman says in the behind-the-scenes featurette “Friendship Beyond the Fence” that he doesn’t consider “The Boy in the Striped Pajamas” to be a “Holocaust film.”) Set in the early 1940s at the height of Nazi Germany’s power, the film follows Bruno on a journey that takes him and his family from Berlin to German-occupied Poland. His father Ralf (David Thewlis) is a newly-promoted SS officer with a new posting: commandant...
Read more