Talking About 'Star Wars': Why doesn't Disney consider 'Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic' canon?

-
© 2003 BioWare and LucasArts
Someone on Quora asks:

Why doesn't Disney consider 'Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic' canon?
Lucasfilm (not its parent, The Walt Disney Company) did not make Bioware/LucasArts’ 2003 video game Knights of the Old Republic or any of its sequels canon for the same reason the company never made X-Wing, TIE Fighter, or Star Wars: The Arcade Game canon: as far as canon is concerned, the movies and directly-derived materials (novelizations, comic book adaptations, and for a long time, the Radio Dramas) were the only materials accepted by franchise creator George Lucas as the “official story.” Period.
This was true in 2005, when it seemed as though no more Star Wars films would ever be made, although Lucas later amended his position on canon to include Star Wars: The Clone Wars, a television series he created and assigned Catherine Winder and Dave Filoni to develop for Time-Warner owned Cartoon Network.
No video games set “a long time ago in a galaxy far, far away” were canon. They could, as Star Wars: Shadows of the Universe, Star Wars: Rebellion, and others surely did, draw on canon (the movies) for inspiration, but just like the Expanded Universe novels and comics that are now “Legends,” they were apocryphal side stories that had no canonical standing until - and unless - George Lucas said otherwise.
In the case of Knights of the Old Republic, when Lucasfilm Licensing discussed the game during the pre-development stage, Drew Karpyshyn and James Ohlen were given two timeline options for their game: the Old Republic era or the interval after Star Wars - Episode II: Attack of the Clones. Karpyshyn and Ohlen chose the Old Republic setting because they believed the other, closer-to-the-movies period would stifle their creative impulses.
George Lucas clearly appreciated the value of video games set in the Star Wars galaxy, but only as a source of income and to keep the Star Wars brand alive. That was also his take on the EU stories, which he relegated to Lucasfilm Licensing with a set of guidelines (no delving into the Rise of the Empire era during Lucas’s own development phase for the Prequels, nothing contradicts what happens in the films) with only some rare instances of direct acknowledgment of the EU in Lucas canon. (“Coruscant” and “Aayla Secura” are two instances of EU place names or characters that were made canonical by the Maker himself.)
But Lucas never, ever thought video games, including Shadows of the Empire, X-Wing Alliance, or even KOTOR and The Force Unleashed, were valid as a medium for storytelling. Cinema, and, to some extent, television, ruled as far as canon is concerned.
As with everything canonical, there’s always a possibility that Lucasfilm might take elements from KOTOR and adapt them into a film or TV project. Indeed, Kathleen Kennedy hinted at a recent Star Wars convention that this is something the company has been considering for some time now.
However, due to The Walt Disney Company and Lucasfilm’s decision to slow the pace of making new Star Wars films, fans will have to wait a few years to see this come to fruition.

Comments

  1. GrimalkunMarch 12, 2020 at 10:59 AM

    "There's this notion that everything changed when everything became Legends. And I can see why people think that. But, you know, having worked with George I can tell you that it was always very clear -- and he made it very clear -- that the films and the TV shows were the only things that he considered Canon. That was it.*

    "So everything else was a world of fun ideas, exciting characters, great possibilities, the EU was created to explore all those things.And I know and I fully respect peoples opinions about it that some of the material said 'the next canon part of it' [It wasn't canon].... But from the filmmaking world I was brought into, *the films and TV shows were it".*
    ~ Dave Filoni speaking about working with George Lucas

    This is the actual video of when Dave Filoni said the above quotes during an interview on 'The Star Wars show' [41.40 mark]
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hcNXPNXOv2A&t=16s




    https://ibb.co/nwXDXBQ

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Alex Diaz-GranadosMarch 12, 2020 at 12:41 PM

      Thank you for the insightful comment! Much appreciated.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How many movies have been made based on Stephen King's 'It'?

-
Image
How many movies have been made based on Stephen King's It ? It  has been adapted twice for filmed audio-visual media. The first filmed version of  It was a TV limited series; the second was a duology of theatrically-released movies.  The first adaptation of Stephen King’s 1986 doorstop of a novel was a 1990 adaptation made as a two-part ABC miniseries for television. Among the cast members: Tim Reid, Harry Anderson, Annette O’Toole, John Ritter, and Richard Thomas. The miniseries also featured Tim Curry as the evil Pennywise the Clown. Adapted for television by director Tommy Lee Wallace and Lawrence D. Cohen (who also adapted King’s  Carrie  for director Brian De Palma in 1976),  It  was okay but a watered-down take on the scary novel about a group of friends who must face off against a monstrous entity known as “It” twice. Once as kids in 1960, then again as adults in 1990. (Like  11,22.63,  the TV version of It avoids the year 1958, which is where parts of  11/22/63 
Read more

Talking About Tom Clancy's 'Ryanverse': Was Jack Ryan a Republican or a Democrat?

-
Image
Harrison Ford starred in two Jack Ryan films. © 1992 Paramount Pictures On Quora, member Maya Lachman asks: Was Jack Ryan a Republican or a Democrat? My reply: If you’re talking about Tom Clancy’s iconic character John Patrick Ryan, Sr., he is depicted in the novels as being Republican, especially in most of the books that follow 1991’s  The Sum of All Fears. In the early Jack Ryan novels ( The Hunt for Red October, Patriot Games, The Cardinal of the Cardinal, Clear and Present Danger,  and  The Sum of All Fears ), Ryan works his way up the ranks in the Central Intelligence Agency, starting out as a recently-recruited analyst and rising all the way to Deputy Director (Intelligence), or DDI. During his time at CIA, Ryan doesn’t have much to say about politics (except in the context of U.S.-Soviet relations, in which case he is obviously a Cold War Republican), but his pre-CIA resume includes a stint as a Marine Corps lieutenant, a successful stockbroker who, despite
Read more

Movie Review: 'PT-109'

-
Image
In June of 1963, five months before the assassination of President John Fitzgerald Kennedy, Warner Bros. released director Leslie Martinson’s  PT-109 , an adaptation of Robert J. Donovan’s non-fiction book  PT-109: John F. Kennedy in World War II.   Starring Cliff Robertson ( Charly, Spider-Man ) as Navy Lieutenant (junior grade) John F. Kennedy and co-starring Ty Hardin, James Gregory, Robert Culp, Robert Blake, Norman Fell and even an uncredited George Takei (Hikaru Sulu of  Star Trek: The Original Series ), the film is a fairly accurate depiction of JFK’s naval service in the South Pacific as the commander of a motor torpedo boat given the Navy pennant number PT-109 (the PT standing for the Navy ship designator “Patrol Torpedo”).  Although Hollywood had made movies in which former Presidents (either living or dead) were depicted, producer Bryan Foy, under the direct guidance of Warner Bros.' head of production Jack Warner (who, in turn, was influenced by Joseph P. Kennedy, a f
Read more