Q & As about 'Star Wars': Does George Lucas regret making Star Wars I, II and III? Star Wars I especially has been badly received but do you think he has any regrets about its production?

-
Does George Lucas regret making Star Wars I, II and III? Star Wars I especially has been badly received but do you think he has any regrets about its production?
I don’t know Mr. Lucas in person, but given what I know about him, his films, and the Star Wars franchise, here’s my educated opinion.
No, I don’t think he regrets making the Star Wars Prequel Trilogy; he created that universe, its history, its population, and the rules that govern how that galaxy far, far away works.
Financially, the Prequels did not tank at the box office; The Phantom Menace had a worldwide gross of $983,588,295. The other two prequels didn’t do as well due to backlash from those fans who hated Episode I, but still, Attack of the Clones earned $640,912,840, while Revenge of the Sith earned $848,754,768. Sure, if the Prequels had been given a warmer reception by both critics and fans, they would have earned more. (And, of course, the money we’re talking about came from the theatrical runs and does not include income from the home media market, plus earnings from books, comics, and collectibles.)
Production-wise, I think George has no regrets about the techniques he used. The tech he used to create the Prequels was still not mature, and contrary to popular belief, he and Industrial Light & Magic used a mix of practical effects, miniature photography, and CGI, rather than all-CGI or mostly CGI. He was also a pioneer in digital cinematography and the use of digital tools in editing both sounds and video images. Lucas has always been one to focus a lot on visuals and sound, and even though the late 1990s and early 2000s CGI doesn’t hold up as well visually compared to CGI 20 years later, I think he’s proud that he helped movie tech move forward.
As a writer, I do believe that Lucas was disappointed that his films didn’t please many fans, but given how highly anticipated the Prequels were at the time (especially Episode I, which hit theaters 16 years after Return of the Jedi), it is likely that even if the scripts had been more polished, the story a bit more compelling, and the casting been pitch-perfect, there still would have been bitching from some fans. And since no sane artist ever starts any project, be it a music album, a novel, a new comic book, a play, or a movie with the intention of giving people a bad experience, I’m sure that Lucas regrets that the fans felt cheated of the viewing experience they were hoping for.
Former actor Jake Lloyd played Anakin Skywalker in The Phantom Menace.  Photo © 1999  Lucasfilm Ltd. 

Achmed Best did all of the on-camera reference photography for the CGI character Jar Jar Binks in the Prequel Trilogy. Photo © 1999 Lucasfilm Ltd.


From what I know about George Lucas as a human being, the biggest regret he has about the Prequels is the shabby treatment received by Jake Lloyd and Achmed Best (Anakin Skywalker in Episode I and Jar Jar Binks, respectively) from fans whose reaction to the films and the two actors’ characters (or their acting) was nothing short of shameful. Lloyd and Best found themselves at the center of a hate-filled storm that was so bad that one quit the business of acting and became so bitter about Star Wars that he got rid of all his collectibles, while the other attempted suicide. Now, the kid known for playing Anakin Skywalker is a medically-diagnosed schizophrenic who blames Lucas for all his woes. Best has fared better; last I heard, he had worked with Lucasfilm Animation on Lucas’s Star Wars: The Clone Wars, a TV series created in part to fill in some of the gaps in the live-action Prequels.
Regret over how actors he hired were treated by toxic fans, I think, are the biggest ones Lucas may have about the Prequels.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How many movies have been made based on Stephen King's 'It'?

-
Image
How many movies have been made based on Stephen King's It ? It  has been adapted twice for filmed audio-visual media. The first filmed version of  It was a TV limited series; the second was a duology of theatrically-released movies.  The first adaptation of Stephen King’s 1986 doorstop of a novel was a 1990 adaptation made as a two-part ABC miniseries for television. Among the cast members: Tim Reid, Harry Anderson, Annette O’Toole, John Ritter, and Richard Thomas. The miniseries also featured Tim Curry as the evil Pennywise the Clown. Adapted for television by director Tommy Lee Wallace and Lawrence D. Cohen (who also adapted King’s  Carrie  for director Brian De Palma in 1976),  It  was okay but a watered-down take on the scary novel about a group of friends who must face off against a monstrous entity known as “It” twice. Once as kids in 1960, then again as adults in 1990. (Like  11,22.63,  the TV version of It avoids the year ...
Read more

Talking About 'Band of Brothers' (HBO Miniseries): Why were there no black soldiers in the Band of Brothers TV miniseries?

-
Image
Band of Brothers,  sadly, reflects one of the sad realities of American society in the 1940s - racial segregation in the armed forces. Although there  were  a few all-Negro (as blacks were referred to in those days) units in the U.S. Army and the Army Air Forces that served with distinction in the European Theater of Operations, most black servicemen were assigned to non-combat units in Supply of Services and other support forces. Most of these soldiers were truck drivers, anti-aircraft gunners, barrage balloon handlers, engineers, stevedores, clerks, cooks, corpsmen, and so on. Only late in the war (fall of 1944 and winter/spring 1945) did large numbers of black infantrymen see combat against German forces, and even then they served in all-black units commanded by white officers. © 2001 Home Box Office, Dreamworks SKG, and Play-Tone Pictures The 101st Airborne Division was an all-American unit made up of individuals from many different groups - Easy Company’...
Read more

'The Boy in Striped Pajamas' movie review

-
Image
(C) 2008 Miramax, Heyday Films, BBC Films Writer-director Mark Herman’s 2008 film “The Boy in the Striped Pajamas” is a faithful but (necessarily) condensed adaptation of John Boyne’s 2007 novel about a German boy, Bruno (Asa Butterfield), who befriends Shmuel (Jack Scanlon), an eight-year-old inmate in a Nazi concentration camp during World War II.  Like Boyne’s novel, the film is not a definitive history of the Holocaust. It’s not as graphic or historically accurate as Steven Spielberg’s 1993 classic “Schindler’s List,” nor was it intended to be. (Indeed, Herman says in the behind-the-scenes featurette “Friendship Beyond the Fence” that he doesn’t consider “The Boy in the Striped Pajamas” to be a “Holocaust film.”) Set in the early 1940s at the height of Nazi Germany’s power, the film follows Bruno on a journey that takes him and his family from Berlin to German-occupied Poland. His father Ralf (David Thewlis) is a newly-promoted SS officer with a new posting: commandant...
Read more