Educating Conservatives: Today's Lesson: Why Fox 'News' Constantly Lies

-
Fox News logo. © 2019 FNC and New Fox



Why does Fox News constantly lie or state false information?
Founded in 1996 by Australian media mogul Rupert Murdoch and led for much of its existence by the late Roger Ailes, Fox News Channel is not primarily a genuine journalistic organization. It has the name “Fox News Channel,” yes, but that’s partly to differentiate itself from its elder sibling, the Fox broadcast television network, which was also a brainchild of Mr. Murdoch and became America’s Fourth Network (after ABC, CBS, and NBC) in 1987.
Mostly, though, “Fox News Channel” is essentially a propaganda outlet for the post-Reagan/Goldwater Republican Party. Its mission, per the concepts laid down by Messrs. Ailes and Murdoch, is to provide viewers with conservative opinion and some news content with a conservative slant (or, if you will, a bias). That’s why much of the cable channel’s programming in prime time (8–11 PM) features Sean Hannity, Laura Ingraham, and other well-known right-wing pundits and almost no news broadcasts except for the occasional “breaking news” or “top of the hour” updates.
Although Murdoch is the guy with the deep pockets that financed FNC and continues to own the cable channel, it was Ailes who first conceived “Faux News” as a right-wing alternative to “liberal media” outlets such as The Washington Post or the New York Times as far back as 1972. Ailes (who resigned in 2016 after several Fox News Channel staffers - including Megyn Kelly - accused him of sexually harassing women under his employ and died several months later after a fatal accident at home) suggested to then-President Richard M. Nixon that the GOP would benefit greatly if conservatives had mass media of their own to counter the aforementioned ABC, CBS, NBC, and various newspapers, media outlets that Nixon considered to be among his greatest “enemies.”
Interestingly, Fox News Channel’s licensing documents with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) describes the network as an “entertainment” outlet, not a newsgathering organization. Fox News does have legitimate reporters who previously worked for the more traditional “liberal” networks, including Brit Hume, Chris Wallace, and others. They do try to provide viewers with real news coverage (Shepard Smith, for one, has often tried to debunk the Uranium One “deal” conspiracy theory, that many Trump supporters obsess about, but to no avail.) Even then, Fox News executives often insist that even legitimate news coverage is given a “rightward” spin.
That’s why Fox News constantly lies or states false information. That is the organization’s Prime Directive.
(Oh, yes. Fox News Channel, along with Murdoch’s original Fox television network, will not be part of the recently-approved merger between The Walt Disney Company and 21st Century Fox, FNC’s present parent company. Those two properties will be spun-off into what Murdoch calls “New Fox.”)

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How many movies have been made based on Stephen King's 'It'?

-
Image
How many movies have been made based on Stephen King's It ? It  has been adapted twice for filmed audio-visual media. The first filmed version of  It was a TV limited series; the second was a duology of theatrically-released movies.  The first adaptation of Stephen King’s 1986 doorstop of a novel was a 1990 adaptation made as a two-part ABC miniseries for television. Among the cast members: Tim Reid, Harry Anderson, Annette O’Toole, John Ritter, and Richard Thomas. The miniseries also featured Tim Curry as the evil Pennywise the Clown. Adapted for television by director Tommy Lee Wallace and Lawrence D. Cohen (who also adapted King’s  Carrie  for director Brian De Palma in 1976),  It  was okay but a watered-down take on the scary novel about a group of friends who must face off against a monstrous entity known as “It” twice. Once as kids in 1960, then again as adults in 1990. (Like  11,22.63,  the TV version of It avoids the year 1958, which is where parts of  11/22/63 
Read more

Talking About 'Band of Brothers' (HBO Miniseries): Why were there no black soldiers in the Band of Brothers TV miniseries?

-
Image
Band of Brothers,  sadly, reflects one of the sad realities of American society in the 1940s - racial segregation in the armed forces. Although there  were  a few all-Negro (as blacks were referred to in those days) units in the U.S. Army and the Army Air Forces that served with distinction in the European Theater of Operations, most black servicemen were assigned to non-combat units in Supply of Services and other support forces. Most of these soldiers were truck drivers, anti-aircraft gunners, barrage balloon handlers, engineers, stevedores, clerks, cooks, corpsmen, and so on. Only late in the war (fall of 1944 and winter/spring 1945) did large numbers of black infantrymen see combat against German forces, and even then they served in all-black units commanded by white officers. © 2001 Home Box Office, Dreamworks SKG, and Play-Tone Pictures The 101st Airborne Division was an all-American unit made up of individuals from many different groups - Easy Company’s first C.O.,
Read more

Bolero: The One Movie I Have Seen That I Wish Could Be Erased From My Memory

-
Image
If you could have 1 movie that you’ve seen in the past erased from your memory, what movie would that be and why? That’s easy.  Bolero. © 1984 Cannon Film Group Now, I have seen more than my fair share of movies that, for one reason or another, I don’t enjoy at all or once liked but have changed my mind about as I have grown older.  Me Before You  is an example of the former;  Avatar  and  Midway  are exemplars of the latter. But writer-director John Derek’s softcore porn movie disguised as an “adventure in ecstasy” is still the dumbest, most boring film I ever paid a movie ticket to go see in an actual multiplex. It’s so bad, in fact, that my friends (yes, I went with a coed group of buds from college) and I decided, collectively, that as spectacular as Bo Derek looks naked, she was way too old to play a nubile if naive girl in her 20s. The story was just a barely-there plot woven together around a series of nude scenes (including the obligatory girl-girl scene) that
Read more