Talkin' About Politics: Are Liberals 'Tarnishing' the US Brand?

-
First of all, I don’t think that any rational person who has a good conscience and loves this country is intentionally trying to tarnish the image of the U.S.
Sure, there are some Americans out there who thrive on creating chaos and want to make the U.S. look like a caricature of a Third World country. Some of them might be extreme leftists or anarchists, while others might be Nazis, white supremacists, and other unsavory individuals who espouse hateful world views.
Overall, however, it simply isn’t true that either conservatives or liberals are intentionally tarnishing the U.S. brand, either domestically or internationally.
That having been said, the folks that are unintentionally tarnishing the U.S. brand are the folks that helped elect Donald J. Trump to be the 45th President of the United States.
Most of these individuals happen to identify as conservatives. Some of them don’t like Trump much but saw in him a means to an end, i.e., to ensure that a Supreme Court vacancy that was deliberately kept vacant in 2016 by the Republican-controlled Congress could be filled by a conservative Associate Justice.
There are also quite a few Trump supporters who admire the man and don’t care, or pretend to not care, that he is hardly the poster boy for conservative values. (Let’s see…a three-times married guy who brags about being able to kiss any woman he wants and - his own words, not mine - grab her by the pussy because he is rich and powerful…a guy who has declared bankruptcy several times and has had to borrow money from Russia because no U.S. bank saw him as a “safe risk” for loans…and a guy who once said that he could shoot someone in the middle of Fifth Avenue and he would still get support from his base. On top of that, they love him even though he is abrasive, uncouth, and narcissistic
Most Trump voters seem to be sincere in their desire to Make America Great Again…..
But their vision of what MAGA means is not only unrealistic, it’s also counterproductive.
When Trump supporters say they want to make America great again, what they really mean is this:
  • They want a return to the way things were in the immediate post-World War II era…where white males dominated the society and culture
  • …women “knew their place” and either stayed home and raised the kids while the husbands worked, or they worked in professions that were geared exclusively for women (teaching, nursing, clerical/secretarial positions
  • …minorities (blacks and Hispanics) also “knew their place,” not just in the Jim Crow South but also in segregated major league baseball (till 1947) and the military (also 1947)
  • ….gays had no rights to speak of and had to stay “in the closet” or be beaten or even killed
  • …America was the world’s biggest manufacturing country and largest exporter of finished goods, especially cars, planes, and consumer goods
  • …multiculturalism did not exist
The problem with the MAGA principle is that the idyllic America of the 1950s simply was not as idyllic as they remember. People who wax nostalgic for The Leave it to Beaver/Father Knows Best seem to have forgotten:
  • The Red Scare of the late 1940s and early 1950s
  • “Tail Gunner” Joe McCarthy and the excesses of the House Committee on Un-American Activities
  • The unfairness of racial segregation under the Separate But Equal rule that kept white children and black children apart in public schools, especially in the South
  • The “boys will be boys” attitude that allowed men to sexually harass women at the workplace with near impunity. This was such a “norm” in the culture that the trope of the lustful married boss chasing the sexy young secretary around the office was common in vaudeville and in Hollywood movies
In short, conservatives don’t like change. They resist progress, even if it is a futile effort, because they want society to remain static and unchanged. It doesn’t matter to them that the past is filled with ugliness, bigotry, and violence; they want time to stand still and to restore an Utopia that exists only in scripted sitcoms and their nostalgia-tinted memories.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How many movies have been made based on Stephen King's 'It'?

-
Image
How many movies have been made based on Stephen King's It ? It  has been adapted twice for filmed audio-visual media. The first filmed version of  It was a TV limited series; the second was a duology of theatrically-released movies.  The first adaptation of Stephen King’s 1986 doorstop of a novel was a 1990 adaptation made as a two-part ABC miniseries for television. Among the cast members: Tim Reid, Harry Anderson, Annette O’Toole, John Ritter, and Richard Thomas. The miniseries also featured Tim Curry as the evil Pennywise the Clown. Adapted for television by director Tommy Lee Wallace and Lawrence D. Cohen (who also adapted King’s  Carrie  for director Brian De Palma in 1976),  It  was okay but a watered-down take on the scary novel about a group of friends who must face off against a monstrous entity known as “It” twice. Once as kids in 1960, then again as adults in 1990. (Like  11,22.63,  the TV version of It avoids the year ...
Read more

Talking About 'Band of Brothers' (HBO Miniseries): Why were there no black soldiers in the Band of Brothers TV miniseries?

-
Image
Band of Brothers,  sadly, reflects one of the sad realities of American society in the 1940s - racial segregation in the armed forces. Although there  were  a few all-Negro (as blacks were referred to in those days) units in the U.S. Army and the Army Air Forces that served with distinction in the European Theater of Operations, most black servicemen were assigned to non-combat units in Supply of Services and other support forces. Most of these soldiers were truck drivers, anti-aircraft gunners, barrage balloon handlers, engineers, stevedores, clerks, cooks, corpsmen, and so on. Only late in the war (fall of 1944 and winter/spring 1945) did large numbers of black infantrymen see combat against German forces, and even then they served in all-black units commanded by white officers. © 2001 Home Box Office, Dreamworks SKG, and Play-Tone Pictures The 101st Airborne Division was an all-American unit made up of individuals from many different groups - Easy Company’...
Read more

'The Boy in Striped Pajamas' movie review

-
Image
(C) 2008 Miramax, Heyday Films, BBC Films Writer-director Mark Herman’s 2008 film “The Boy in the Striped Pajamas” is a faithful but (necessarily) condensed adaptation of John Boyne’s 2007 novel about a German boy, Bruno (Asa Butterfield), who befriends Shmuel (Jack Scanlon), an eight-year-old inmate in a Nazi concentration camp during World War II.  Like Boyne’s novel, the film is not a definitive history of the Holocaust. It’s not as graphic or historically accurate as Steven Spielberg’s 1993 classic “Schindler’s List,” nor was it intended to be. (Indeed, Herman says in the behind-the-scenes featurette “Friendship Beyond the Fence” that he doesn’t consider “The Boy in the Striped Pajamas” to be a “Holocaust film.”) Set in the early 1940s at the height of Nazi Germany’s power, the film follows Bruno on a journey that takes him and his family from Berlin to German-occupied Poland. His father Ralf (David Thewlis) is a newly-promoted SS officer with a new posting: commandant...
Read more