Talkin' Politics: My answer to 'Does Donald Trump represent your values and beliefs as an American citizen and why?'

-
Q: Does Donald Trump represent your values and beliefs as an American citizen and why?
A: No. Not one bit.
As I often remark when I reply to Trump-related questions, I have never been a partisan kind of guy. Sure, since 1992 I’ve voted mostly for Democratic candidates, but I always take the time to look at what the Republican Party has to offer when it comes to state and national level legislators and chief executives.
Look. When I registered to vote back in 1984 I chose to not join any of the established political parties. I sacrificed my right to vote in Florida’s closed party primaries because I felt then (as I do now) that neither the GOP or the Democratic Party fully represented my values or my beliefs.
Back then, I still tended to think in Cold War era terms. The Republicans under Ronald Reagan and G.H.W. Bush tended to support a strong military…not one that sought to start a war with the Soviet Union, but rather strong enough to deter one. And 33 years after casting my first vote, I still feel that way.
I didn’t buy “Reaganomics” or the “trickle-down” theory that Republicans have been pushing since the 1980 election - namely, that lowering taxes on the wealthy results in more spending by said wealthy and thus more jobs (and possibly more wealth) “trickles down” to the middle and working poor classes.
That never happens. What does happen is that rich entrepreneurs move their businesses overseas or simply close down factories because Japan, China, Taiwan, and South Korea make cheaper consumer goods and decent cars.
And the money they save from tax cuts? It goes into trust funds, overseas accounts, or under a mattress somewhere. The rich get richer, the poor get poorer, and the middle class gets squashed.
So when I voted for Reagan and Bush, I did so because I detested Communism (still do) and didn’t quite trust the Democrats on national defense issues. I thought (perhaps wrongly) that most Democrats were anti-military at the time as a result of the Vietnam War.
In short, I voted for The Gipper and “Read My Lips, No New Taxes” because I was afraid that World War III was going to break out in my lifetime unless the U.S. had a strong military.
Eventually, I drifted toward the Democratic side of the aisle when Bill Clinton ran for President in ‘92. Not because I thought Bill or Hillary were perfect human beings; clearly they are not. Bill has always been a great politician and left the economy in good shape when he left office on Jan. 20, 2001, but he is also a guy with a lot of human flaws. And Hillary is intelligent, caring, and a dedicated public servant…but she also has a tendency to rub some people the wrong way.
Still, I voted for Clinton in 1992 and 1996 because Democratic Presidents seem to have a knack for leaving the economy in better shape than it was when they were inaugurated, especially after a Republican Administration. The only issues I had with the Clinton Presidency were related - again - to military and foreign policy, especially in Somalia after the Black Hawk Down incident in 1993.
My values have always been centered around three basic tenets:
  1. A sound national defense policy
  2. A sound fiscal policy that doesn’t favor the wealthy excessively and provides a safety net for the poor, the elderly, and the disabled
  3. A government that operates with a clear and distinct separation of church and state
The Republican Party currently tends to support the first of the three tenets of my belief system, but not the other two. Ever since the GOP allied itself with the Evangelical Christian movement (thanks, Jerry Falwell..NOT), the conservatives have become more and more fundamentalist. And if there is anything that history teaches us about fundamentalist movements (like that in Iran, for instance) is that underneath the cover of religious piety, their ultimate goal is to achieve political power.
Trump, by running as a Republican (a move he made out of convenience rather than of conviction) does not reflect my beliefs or my values.
He caters to xenophobes; I am not a xenophobe.
He caters to white supremacists; I am not a white supremacist
He stirs up Islamophobes by not criticizing hate speech against Muslims; I don’t like Islamophobes.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How many movies have been made based on Stephen King's 'It'?

-
Image
How many movies have been made based on Stephen King's It ? It  has been adapted twice for filmed audio-visual media. The first filmed version of  It was a TV limited series; the second was a duology of theatrically-released movies.  The first adaptation of Stephen King’s 1986 doorstop of a novel was a 1990 adaptation made as a two-part ABC miniseries for television. Among the cast members: Tim Reid, Harry Anderson, Annette O’Toole, John Ritter, and Richard Thomas. The miniseries also featured Tim Curry as the evil Pennywise the Clown. Adapted for television by director Tommy Lee Wallace and Lawrence D. Cohen (who also adapted King’s  Carrie  for director Brian De Palma in 1976),  It  was okay but a watered-down take on the scary novel about a group of friends who must face off against a monstrous entity known as “It” twice. Once as kids in 1960, then again as adults in 1990. (Like  11,22.63,  the TV version of It avoids the year ...
Read more

Talking About 'Band of Brothers' (HBO Miniseries): Why were there no black soldiers in the Band of Brothers TV miniseries?

-
Image
Band of Brothers,  sadly, reflects one of the sad realities of American society in the 1940s - racial segregation in the armed forces. Although there  were  a few all-Negro (as blacks were referred to in those days) units in the U.S. Army and the Army Air Forces that served with distinction in the European Theater of Operations, most black servicemen were assigned to non-combat units in Supply of Services and other support forces. Most of these soldiers were truck drivers, anti-aircraft gunners, barrage balloon handlers, engineers, stevedores, clerks, cooks, corpsmen, and so on. Only late in the war (fall of 1944 and winter/spring 1945) did large numbers of black infantrymen see combat against German forces, and even then they served in all-black units commanded by white officers. © 2001 Home Box Office, Dreamworks SKG, and Play-Tone Pictures The 101st Airborne Division was an all-American unit made up of individuals from many different groups - Easy Company’...
Read more

'The Boy in Striped Pajamas' movie review

-
Image
(C) 2008 Miramax, Heyday Films, BBC Films Writer-director Mark Herman’s 2008 film “The Boy in the Striped Pajamas” is a faithful but (necessarily) condensed adaptation of John Boyne’s 2007 novel about a German boy, Bruno (Asa Butterfield), who befriends Shmuel (Jack Scanlon), an eight-year-old inmate in a Nazi concentration camp during World War II.  Like Boyne’s novel, the film is not a definitive history of the Holocaust. It’s not as graphic or historically accurate as Steven Spielberg’s 1993 classic “Schindler’s List,” nor was it intended to be. (Indeed, Herman says in the behind-the-scenes featurette “Friendship Beyond the Fence” that he doesn’t consider “The Boy in the Striped Pajamas” to be a “Holocaust film.”) Set in the early 1940s at the height of Nazi Germany’s power, the film follows Bruno on a journey that takes him and his family from Berlin to German-occupied Poland. His father Ralf (David Thewlis) is a newly-promoted SS officer with a new posting: commandant...
Read more