Old Gamers Never Die: In 'Regiments, ' the Faction You Choose Determines How Well (or How Badly) You'll Fare in Battle

-

Although I commanded a U.S. brigade in the Skirmish from which I snapped this screenshot, Regiments now features British regiments that were based in West Germany in 1989. Here, a British light tank, supported by infantry (lower left) fires at an advancing Warsaw Pact platoon (top center). All graphic and game design elements in this and other screenshots are © 2022 Bird's Eye Games and MicroProse.) 

 As you know, I’ve been playing Regiments (2022, Bird’s Eye Games/MicroProse) since its release last August; it’s the first title I buy on Steam from the revived MicroProse, and I had been waiting for it since it was announced a few years ago.

The revamped main menu page in Regiments. 


So far, I’ve played through all the tutorials, the three Skirmish modes (Attack, Meeting Engagement, and Mobile Defense), and I even started the grand campaign (Operations). I got stuck on the West German Operation and I am not sure if I want to restart the campaign or just wait till I get better at Regiments, but I do play the game at least once a week and I’m getting the hang of it.

Even with the tweaks made by Bird’s Eye Games for the December 25, 2022 Regiments: Second Wave reboot that included the only free DLC offering we’ll get – from now on, when MicroProse and Bird’s Eye Games offer DLC updates, we gamers must decide whether or not we want them, because they’ll be “premium” content – I have done well with Skirmish-type single battles. I do well in the Attack missions, so-so in Meeting Engagement ones, and good in Mobile Defense scenarios.

"Route 'Sherwood' " is a new game map introduced in December with the Second Wave DLC reboot. The 1st Brigade/3rd Armored Division (aka the "Spearhead Division") is my favorite NATO unit, although I make it a point to try to "command" units from the four Western nations represented in Regiments. 


I usually play as a NATO commander. I’ve played a couple of times as a Soviet/Warsaw Pact commander (so far, Regiments allows players to command either Soviet or East German units, even though the Warsaw Pact had more member nations, including Poland, Hungary, Czechoslovakia, and Romania), but I prefer to “command” Western units. I’ve never liked playing as an “enemy” nation in games where you can choose which faction to command, so I usually stick to American, West German, Belgian, or British units. (The designers added at least three British units to the game’s order of battle in the Second Wave upgrade.)

The Soviets lost an entire platoon to a carefully set ambush in the woods in the "Route 'Sherwood' " scenario. I can see at least four BMPs aflame in this screengrab. 


Anyway, on Friday night I played Regiments as a British commander; it’s only the second or third time that I play with units from the UK’s British Army on the Rhine (BAOR) command, which was assigned to NATO’s Northern Army Group (NORTHAG) in West Germany from 1949 to 1990.

And since I’ve been trying to play through various geographical variants of Mobile Defense from the perspective of the various NATO armies involved, I discovered that even though I can beat the AI in Mobile Defense scenarios consistently (at least on Easy difficulty settings), the quality of the weapons and the mix of vehicles, platoon types, and weapons systems determines the number of casualties I suffer.

My best after-action report since I bought Regiments in August. 

These are either BMP-2 or BMP-3 infantry fighting vehicles killed by Spearhead Division forces during the Route "Sherwood" fight. 


For instance, with the Americans’ 1st Brigade of the 3rd Armored Division, I’ve gotten to the point where I only suffer heavy losses due to tactical errors and not on the mix of weapons, vehicles, and tactical aids I have at my disposal. Even with the developer’s decision to equip the 1st Brigade with M1A1 Abrams tanks and remove the two-helicopter flight of AH-1F Cobra gunships from the core task force at the player’s command at the start of a Skirmish, I have reached a point – at least on the Easy difficulty level – in Mobile Defense scenarios where the Blue Force, i.e. the unit I command directly, loses only a few vehicles, suffers relatively low casualties, and my helicopter crews don’t call me “the Butcher” because I avoid heavy losses to my Cobras or AH-64A Apaches.

I tend to do better as a U.S. commander in Regiments, especially if I have Bradley variants in my Table of Organization and Equipment (TO&E). 


With the British, though, I still won the two Skirmishes I have played with them on Mobile Defense, but their armored personnel carriers (“battle taxis”) or APCs can’t stand up to Soviet BMPs (any model) or main battle tanks on the modern battlefield. The dismounted infantry, especially platoons with Milan anti-tank guided missiles (ATGM) often do well against these vehicles, but their APCs lack the 25mm autocannon or ATGM tubes of the American M2/M3 Bradley family, so I tend to suffer heavy casualties among my mechanized infantry platoons when I command British units in Regiments.

British forces can inflict heavy casualties on enemy armored units, provided they and their NATO allies (in this case, a West German panzer unit with Leopard MBTs) have the right tools for the job. 

Here, a West German 2-Leopard tank section holds off a Soviet attack as British transports (not seen in this image but mentioned in the info box at bottom center) evacuate NATO personnel from an Objective Zone. 


British tanks – represented in the game by different “marks” or models of the Chieftain and the then-new Challenger main battle tank – are sturdy and fare well against their Soviet/Warsaw Pact counterparts. But the TOW-armed Lynx anti-tank helicopters are vulnerable to enemy surface-to-air missiles (SAMs) and mobile antiaircraft artillery (AAA), and Friday I lost four of those whirlybirds.

Although my overall casualties were "light" compared to those suffered by the Red Force, I still lost four helicopters. (The Soviets, though, lost two close support aircraft, so the British-West Germans had good anti-aircraft weapons, too. 


I still won the Skirmish with the 750 victory points needed for a Total Victory, but my losses were heavier than I would have liked.  

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How many movies have been made based on Stephen King's 'It'?

-
Image
How many movies have been made based on Stephen King's It ? It  has been adapted twice for filmed audio-visual media. The first filmed version of  It was a TV limited series; the second was a duology of theatrically-released movies.  The first adaptation of Stephen King’s 1986 doorstop of a novel was a 1990 adaptation made as a two-part ABC miniseries for television. Among the cast members: Tim Reid, Harry Anderson, Annette O’Toole, John Ritter, and Richard Thomas. The miniseries also featured Tim Curry as the evil Pennywise the Clown. Adapted for television by director Tommy Lee Wallace and Lawrence D. Cohen (who also adapted King’s  Carrie  for director Brian De Palma in 1976),  It  was okay but a watered-down take on the scary novel about a group of friends who must face off against a monstrous entity known as “It” twice. Once as kids in 1960, then again as adults in 1990. (Like  11,22.63,  the TV version of It avoids the year ...
Read more

Talking About 'Band of Brothers' (HBO Miniseries): Why were there no black soldiers in the Band of Brothers TV miniseries?

-
Image
Band of Brothers,  sadly, reflects one of the sad realities of American society in the 1940s - racial segregation in the armed forces. Although there  were  a few all-Negro (as blacks were referred to in those days) units in the U.S. Army and the Army Air Forces that served with distinction in the European Theater of Operations, most black servicemen were assigned to non-combat units in Supply of Services and other support forces. Most of these soldiers were truck drivers, anti-aircraft gunners, barrage balloon handlers, engineers, stevedores, clerks, cooks, corpsmen, and so on. Only late in the war (fall of 1944 and winter/spring 1945) did large numbers of black infantrymen see combat against German forces, and even then they served in all-black units commanded by white officers. © 2001 Home Box Office, Dreamworks SKG, and Play-Tone Pictures The 101st Airborne Division was an all-American unit made up of individuals from many different groups - Easy Company’...
Read more

'The Boy in Striped Pajamas' movie review

-
Image
(C) 2008 Miramax, Heyday Films, BBC Films Writer-director Mark Herman’s 2008 film “The Boy in the Striped Pajamas” is a faithful but (necessarily) condensed adaptation of John Boyne’s 2007 novel about a German boy, Bruno (Asa Butterfield), who befriends Shmuel (Jack Scanlon), an eight-year-old inmate in a Nazi concentration camp during World War II.  Like Boyne’s novel, the film is not a definitive history of the Holocaust. It’s not as graphic or historically accurate as Steven Spielberg’s 1993 classic “Schindler’s List,” nor was it intended to be. (Indeed, Herman says in the behind-the-scenes featurette “Friendship Beyond the Fence” that he doesn’t consider “The Boy in the Striped Pajamas” to be a “Holocaust film.”) Set in the early 1940s at the height of Nazi Germany’s power, the film follows Bruno on a journey that takes him and his family from Berlin to German-occupied Poland. His father Ralf (David Thewlis) is a newly-promoted SS officer with a new posting: commandant...
Read more