Life in the Time of COVID-19: Update for May 2, 2020

-
Photo Illustration: Pixabay

Hi, there, Constant Reader. Well, it's Saturday, May 2, and it's late morning here in my corner of Florida. The current temperature is 71℉ (22℃) under mostly sunny skies. Looking at the forecast, it looks like it's going to be a warm, sunny day, with temperatures expected to reach a high of 84℉ (29℃), dropping at night to a low of 63℉ (17℃). No rain is expected to fall in our area today.

Well, here we are in the fifth month of 2020, and we Floridians are still hunkering down in our homes due to the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. Sadly, the Sunshine State is governed (for lack of a better word) by the Republican Party, and our governor, Ron DeSantis is a Donald Trump loyalist who is rarin' to reopen the state for business ASAP. This is not an attitude unique to our state; other Southern (and Republican-dominated) states like Tennessee and Georgia are reopening some businesses, although this is pretty much asking for trouble, as the virus is still floating around and more, not less, cases of COVID-19 are being reported.

As of this morning, the United States leads the world in the number of reported and confirmed cases of COVID-19: 1,104,305 (at 9:32 AM EDT). We also have the distinction of having the most fatalities: 65,069. In Florida, my home state, there have been 34,728 confirmed cases and 1,314 deaths. And because many people do not wear masks or practice the six-foot separation rules at stores and other places, the spread is not really slowing.

So if Governor DeSantis decides to "open Florida for business" soon, it will be a disaster, and we'll see a spike in both reported infections and deaths. Already, where Georgia's governor issued a limited lifting of restrictions on certain businesses, there was a "spike" in COVID-19 cases. Coincidence? I think not.

I wish that the pandemic would burn itself out or, at the very least, that the "slow the spread" campaign would be more effective than it is at present. Clearly, some of the self-quarantine and social distancing clearly works, or else the numbers of patients with COVID-19 and the death toll would be much higher. But many Americans are either in denial or think that "flattening the curve" and "slowing the spread" measures are just politically-motivated efforts to hurt the reelection chances of one Donald J. Trump.

 Trump and his supporters have made a bad situation even worse by (a) mismanaging the efforts to fight the pandemic from Day 1, (b) minimizing the severity of COVID-19's effects by saying "it's no worse than the flu," and (c) blaming others, including the Chinese government, Barack Obama, and the World Health Organization (WHO) for the Trump Administration's incompetence and slow reaction to the crisis. 

 Ugh.

In other news, I finished reading Richard B. Frank's Tower of Skulls, the first book in a new trilogy about the Asia-Pacific War that began with Japan's war against China in 1937 and became, after December 7, 1941, another theater in the global conflict known as World War II. This first volume focuses on the first years of the Asia-Pacific War and ends shortly before the Battle of the Coral Sea (May 1942), the "high tide" of Japanese power in the region.

© 2020 W.W. Norton & Company
Overall, the book is a fascinating re-examination of the war that destroyed the Imperial Japanese Empire, with a badly-needed focus on the role played by China and its leaders, especially Generalissimo Chiang Kai-Shek in the runup to Pearl Harbor. Most Americans have forgotten that it was Japan's aggression toward China that prompted the Roosevelt Administration to take the measures that it did between 1940 and 1941, including the rebasing of the Pacific Fleet from San Diego to Hawaii in 1940 and a total trade embargo - especially oil - after Japan's army occupied French Indochina (modern-day Vietnam) in early 1941.

The book is well-written and a riveting read, but I wish W.W. Norton's proofreaders had looked at the galley proofs a bit more closely.  Not only are there a few distracting typos in the text, but in the endpaper maps, there are quite a few embarrassing mistakes concerning the dates of Japan's conquests in late 1941 and early 1942. If I ever get around to reviewing the book here, I'll explain further.

Anyway, that's it for today. I will probably spend most of today writing another blog post for my WordPress blog, and maybe even watch a movie in the evening.

So, until next time, Dear Reader, stay safe, stay healthy, and I'll catch you on the sunny side of things.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How many movies have been made based on Stephen King's 'It'?

-
Image
How many movies have been made based on Stephen King's It ? It  has been adapted twice for filmed audio-visual media. The first filmed version of  It was a TV limited series; the second was a duology of theatrically-released movies.  The first adaptation of Stephen King’s 1986 doorstop of a novel was a 1990 adaptation made as a two-part ABC miniseries for television. Among the cast members: Tim Reid, Harry Anderson, Annette O’Toole, John Ritter, and Richard Thomas. The miniseries also featured Tim Curry as the evil Pennywise the Clown. Adapted for television by director Tommy Lee Wallace and Lawrence D. Cohen (who also adapted King’s  Carrie  for director Brian De Palma in 1976),  It  was okay but a watered-down take on the scary novel about a group of friends who must face off against a monstrous entity known as “It” twice. Once as kids in 1960, then again as adults in 1990. (Like  11,22.63,  the TV version of It avoids the year ...
Read more

Talking About 'Band of Brothers' (HBO Miniseries): Why were there no black soldiers in the Band of Brothers TV miniseries?

-
Image
Band of Brothers,  sadly, reflects one of the sad realities of American society in the 1940s - racial segregation in the armed forces. Although there  were  a few all-Negro (as blacks were referred to in those days) units in the U.S. Army and the Army Air Forces that served with distinction in the European Theater of Operations, most black servicemen were assigned to non-combat units in Supply of Services and other support forces. Most of these soldiers were truck drivers, anti-aircraft gunners, barrage balloon handlers, engineers, stevedores, clerks, cooks, corpsmen, and so on. Only late in the war (fall of 1944 and winter/spring 1945) did large numbers of black infantrymen see combat against German forces, and even then they served in all-black units commanded by white officers. © 2001 Home Box Office, Dreamworks SKG, and Play-Tone Pictures The 101st Airborne Division was an all-American unit made up of individuals from many different groups - Easy Company’...
Read more

'The Boy in Striped Pajamas' movie review

-
Image
(C) 2008 Miramax, Heyday Films, BBC Films Writer-director Mark Herman’s 2008 film “The Boy in the Striped Pajamas” is a faithful but (necessarily) condensed adaptation of John Boyne’s 2007 novel about a German boy, Bruno (Asa Butterfield), who befriends Shmuel (Jack Scanlon), an eight-year-old inmate in a Nazi concentration camp during World War II.  Like Boyne’s novel, the film is not a definitive history of the Holocaust. It’s not as graphic or historically accurate as Steven Spielberg’s 1993 classic “Schindler’s List,” nor was it intended to be. (Indeed, Herman says in the behind-the-scenes featurette “Friendship Beyond the Fence” that he doesn’t consider “The Boy in the Striped Pajamas” to be a “Holocaust film.”) Set in the early 1940s at the height of Nazi Germany’s power, the film follows Bruno on a journey that takes him and his family from Berlin to German-occupied Poland. His father Ralf (David Thewlis) is a newly-promoted SS officer with a new posting: commandant...
Read more